So, I left off months ago on the 23 things....
But I have read up on RSS and I know will be creating at least one RSS link to my blog. But frankly, I am just not a blogger. I have so many ways of getting the information I need and that I am interested in and I don't think I will be using blogs except for occasionally.
I could see myself RSS'ing a news site or ala or something....but not yet. One thing every few months...that is about what my busy job will allow.
Steph
Monday, February 2, 2009
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
I read all about it!
Okay, I did a lot of reading there and I am glad I did because it really gave me a good grasp on how I will be "reacting to resources" now and in the near future. With increasing knowledge I will also help patrons react to resources.
The video helped me to see text move to hypertext and now to XML where no code is needed as people use content to connect. Web 2.0 and Library 2.0 = linking people.
As to the blog post, I understand why Library 2.0 exists and I see the argument about keeping libraries relevant. Not "making" libraries relevant as the blogger noted, but keeping them relevant as I will note.
The Chapter in the book shows that there are numerous online applications that allow us to do what we used to do on desktops. We, I and YOU control the information age....this is starting to make me antsy. I don't like the lack of control and authority in resources.....EEK!
And so I read that I need "radical trust." Boy, I'd say!
As 2.0 connects conversations, presence and feelings...one has to trust that people will remain well informed. I did like the examples given for how several libraries have incorporated the "building blocks."
I also like the argument that 2.0 is a social conversation. Libraries are very good at this and so am I :)
Lastly, the article. Again it hits home the point that our digital world is no longer just sites but shared network space. As to the Icebergs that were noted. I must say that I disagree with the librarian who answers a drop in circulation by 55% with only a digital answer. Libraries do need to adopt new digital tools, use them and promote them, but I will always argue that a comprehensive book collection is needed, but their collection needs better promotion. Perhaps they need to hire better Children's Librarians to train those lifelong users in ALL tools available on the planet.
I do agree with the comment about User Education, our users are not always educated in use of all tools, and it is up to us to be knowledgeable about all our services, both digital and material.
As to the "come to us" iceberg, well, yes we need to be virtual, but my experience with great libraries is many want to visit the building as well.
Branch libraries were derived from a need to get books and information and other services out to communities and their children. We cannot have a physical branch in every community corner, but digital tools will at least help us reach the "haves" who have a computer at home.
I like the idea of all these shared tools and the conversation we can have because of them, but let's not throw the traditional services out the door when so many are still using them and in my mind, always will.
Signed,
Stephanie, just back from an exploration into new worlds.
The video helped me to see text move to hypertext and now to XML where no code is needed as people use content to connect. Web 2.0 and Library 2.0 = linking people.
As to the blog post, I understand why Library 2.0 exists and I see the argument about keeping libraries relevant. Not "making" libraries relevant as the blogger noted, but keeping them relevant as I will note.
The Chapter in the book shows that there are numerous online applications that allow us to do what we used to do on desktops. We, I and YOU control the information age....this is starting to make me antsy. I don't like the lack of control and authority in resources.....EEK!
And so I read that I need "radical trust." Boy, I'd say!
As 2.0 connects conversations, presence and feelings...one has to trust that people will remain well informed. I did like the examples given for how several libraries have incorporated the "building blocks."
I also like the argument that 2.0 is a social conversation. Libraries are very good at this and so am I :)
Lastly, the article. Again it hits home the point that our digital world is no longer just sites but shared network space. As to the Icebergs that were noted. I must say that I disagree with the librarian who answers a drop in circulation by 55% with only a digital answer. Libraries do need to adopt new digital tools, use them and promote them, but I will always argue that a comprehensive book collection is needed, but their collection needs better promotion. Perhaps they need to hire better Children's Librarians to train those lifelong users in ALL tools available on the planet.
I do agree with the comment about User Education, our users are not always educated in use of all tools, and it is up to us to be knowledgeable about all our services, both digital and material.
As to the "come to us" iceberg, well, yes we need to be virtual, but my experience with great libraries is many want to visit the building as well.
Branch libraries were derived from a need to get books and information and other services out to communities and their children. We cannot have a physical branch in every community corner, but digital tools will at least help us reach the "haves" who have a computer at home.
I like the idea of all these shared tools and the conversation we can have because of them, but let's not throw the traditional services out the door when so many are still using them and in my mind, always will.
Signed,
Stephanie, just back from an exploration into new worlds.
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
I can see you!
Perhaps you think those binoculars on my avatar are for bird watching.....
well, you would be right. I am an avid bird watcher ever since I took Advanced Field biology at good ole Indiana University.
But I also am going to use them to look into the future of 23 things!
I had no trouble setting up the blog and that is because of Phil's excellent instructions.
I am very glad MCPL is pursuing Library 2.0 and 23 things in this manner. Phil, you make us look good.
Stephanie
well, you would be right. I am an avid bird watcher ever since I took Advanced Field biology at good ole Indiana University.
But I also am going to use them to look into the future of 23 things!
I had no trouble setting up the blog and that is because of Phil's excellent instructions.
I am very glad MCPL is pursuing Library 2.0 and 23 things in this manner. Phil, you make us look good.
Stephanie
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
